Gulte News
Increasing ticket prices for big-budget films has become a common practice in the Telugu states.
Movie makers raise prices based on the film’s budget, business potential, and audience demand, and governments often grant permission without much resistance.
However, there is growing concern that the opinions of the audience are being ignored in this process. Many believe that just because a film has hype, ticket prices are being hiked without considering the impact on viewers, leading to widespread dissatisfaction.
This issue has become particularly evident with the ticket prices for Pushpa 2 in Telangana. The rates for the film have left many shocked.
For the premiere show the night before the official release, the ticket price was hiked by as much as ₹800. The original ticket prices now range from ₹1150 to ₹1350 per ticket, depending on the screen. For the next four days, single-screen ticket prices are pegged at ₹380, while multiplex tickets have exceeded ₹570.
There is no denying the massive nationwide craze for Pushpa 2. However, the question arises whether it is fair to capitalize on this hype in such an aggressive manner.
Even for massive blockbusters like Baahubali, RRR, and Kalki, ticket prices were not raised to this extent. Baahubali 2 had a much larger fanbase and more intricate visuals, and its ticket prices were slightly higher. Similarly, Kalki also had a large-scale production, but ticket prices were more reasonable.
Pushpa 2, on the other hand, is not a film known for grand visuals or extravagant settings. While the movie may be good, it isn’t a visual spectacle that justifies such steep ticket prices, says some of the common move lovers.
Raising ticket prices unnecessarily and selling them to distributors at inflated rates ultimately places a heavy burden on the audience. The film may be popular now, but the real test will come after the release.
If the content doesn’t live up to the expectations and the movie gets mixed reviews, those hiked ticket prices could backfire, turning away audiences and damaging the film’s long-term prospects.
